|P R E S S R E L E A S E
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Historic Conference on the
Right to Self-Determination & the United Nations
Pushes for UN Self-Determination Mechanisms
Conference resolutions below
GENEVA (15 August 2000) The First International Conference on the Right to Self-Determination and the
United Nations concluded in Geneva with the unanimous adoption of its resolutions, amid expression by
many of the attendees that the three-day event marked an historic milestone in the struggle of the
international community to come to grips with the thorny issue of the internationally-recognized right to
Co-sponsored by the International Human Rights Association of American Minorities (IHRAAM), an
international NGO in consultative status with the UN, and the International Council for Human Rights
(ICHR), the Conference attracted a full house of delegates, who packed the Zurich Room of the prestigious
Forum Park Hotel to hear the Conference Roster of distinguished speakers, participate in the four
Conference workshops, and draft and adopt the final Conference resolutions urging the establishment of
new UN mechanisms related to self-determination.
Conference speakers included eminent United Nations experts, members of several governments,
distinguished jurists and scholars. NGO attendees from all corners of the globe delivered interventions
concerning the self-determination needs of a wide range of indigenous populations, minorities, and
nations, including the Kashmiris, Native Americans, African Americans, Irish, Tamils, Saamis, Dalits of
India, Canadian First Nations, Khmer Krom of Vietnam, Chechens, Mon of Burma, Puerto Ricans, the
Quichua indigenous nation of Ecuador, the Zanzibaris, etc.
Mr. Glélé-Ahanhanzo, the UN Special Rapporteur on Racism, Racial Discrimination and Xenophobia, was
in attendance for the opening banquet, while UN Sub-Commission expert David Weissbrodt and Mme.
Blyth-Kubota, from the UN Working Group on Minorities Secretariat, visited the Conference on its second
day. Mr. Daniel Atchebro, Human Rights Officer at the Office of the High Commissioner on Human Rights,
in a presentation from the floor, outlined the program of the forthcoming World Conference Against Racism
for Conference delegates, and urged their participation.
Mr. George Reid, Deputy Presiding Officer of the Scottish Parliament, delivered a stirring inaugural
address, recounting the several centuries-long struggle of the Scottish people for self-determination, which
is only now nearing resolution through the recent creation of the Scottish Parliament. He acknowledged
the problematic posed by the melting pot paradigm for dealing with internal nations and peoples, and saw
great hope for the future in the combination of self-determination of peoples on a local level, when
accompanied by their integration as a politico-cultural unit into a greater regional body such as the
In his Welcoming Address to Conference attendees, IHRAAM Chair, Dr. Y. N. Kly elaborated on the
detrimental effects of melting pot policies imposed upon national minorities in multinational states,
leading frequently to their incorporation into the lower caste or underclass of the dominant majority, a
position which left them at a permanent disadvantage in the competition for wealth, status, education, and
all other socio-economic needs. He called upon the Conference not merely to address the need for
self-determination in specific situations, but to give full consideration to how the United Nations might be
restructured to facilitate the resolution of longstanding inequities and conflicts related to the non-realization
of the right to self-determination.
Conference Moderator, Barrister Majid Tramboo, a member of the IHRAAM Directorate and Executive
Director of the International Council for Human Rights (ICHR), informed the delegates that the Government
of India had not facilitated Mr. Mohd. Yasin Malik, a guest of honor at the Conference, with travel documents
necessary to his attendance at the Conference. Barrister Tramboo moved a petition addressed to UN
Secretary General Kofi Annan and UN High Commissioner on Human Rights, Mary Robinson, which noted
with deep regret that the Indian authorities failure to provide Mr. Yasin Malik with the relevant travel
documents was a blatant violation of his fundamental human right to movement, condemned this act by
the Government of India, and demanded that Mr. Yasin Malik be provided with the travel documents
forthwith. This petition was overwhelmingly endorsed by Conference attendees. A later highlight of the
Conference occurred when organizers succeeded in establishing a telephone link to India, through which
Mohd. Yasin Malik, Chairman of the Jammu-Kashmir Liberation Front and an Executive Member of the All
Parties Hurriyat Conference (A.P.H.C.) advised a hushed Conference plenary in halting tones:
Political disputes are being resolved around the world by political dialogue. I ask you, why must the
Kashmiris be forced to accept solutions imposed by the occupiers of our country? I wish to make it crystal
clear to you that my organization, the JKLF, cannot see any other solution to the crisis in Kashmir. We think
re-unification and complete independence for Jammu-Kashmir is the ONLY answer to the problem, which
should be determined through the exercise of the right to self-determination. Internal autonomy;
maintaining the status quo; partitioning the state
all of this has been tried over the past 50 years
these options have failed. I seek your support for this amicable solution, which will not only cater to the
legitimate national interests of all our neighbors, India and Pakistan, but will, as well, safeguard the rights
of all our minority communities in Jammu-Kashmir.
Syed Nazir Gilani of the Jammu Kashmir Council for Human Rights, speaking on the Kashmiris right to
self-determination, advised that there has been a total lack of understanding of the jurisprudence of UN
resolutions on Kashmir
Self-determination succeeds the right to life. India and Pakistan as member
nations of the UN, as parties to the dispute and under their shared constitutional stipulations in their
respective territories of control and command, have to admit the culpability on the loss of life in Kashmir
and on their non-compliance with UN resolutions on Kashmir.
The Conference opened with Theme IV (The Role of the UN in implementing its promised and just
demand of peoples for Self-Determination), moderated by IHRAAM Chair, Dr. Y. N. Kly. Madame Erica
Daes, who has only recently become a former Chairperson of the UN Working Group on Indigenous
Populations, delivered a resume of international law and indigenous people, and the considerations
surrounding the draft Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. She advised that
self-determination cannot be defined in the abstract, and that people living together in a multinational state
must be willing to continuously renegotiate the terms of their relations, in a context of mutual respect. Her
resume of the desperate situation of the worlds first peoples, and the need to recognize the depth of their
ties to their lands was profound and compelling. Karen Parker, an international lawyer and Chief/Delegate
of the International Educational Developmental/Humanitarian Law Project at the United Nations, discussed
in detail the nature of international humanitarian law and its application to armed conflicts in pursuit of the
exercise of the right to self-determination in the context of numerous situations in southern Asia.
Professor Ramon Nenadich, from Puerto Rico chaired Theme I (Self-Determination as a form of collective
restorative justice for the malformation of many multinational states created through exercise of the
now-discredited historical right to conquest and domination). Mr. Daniel Turp, Canadian MP and Bloc
Quebeçois Critic for Intergovernmental Affairs, discussed the nature of self-determination as it related to
the collision of Canadas Bill C-20 and Quebecs Bill 99 in the continuing confrontation between Canada
and Quebec over the wording of a future Quebec referendum question related to sovereignty-association.
Ms. Suzette Bronkhurst of the Magenta Foundation discussed the historical and contemporary situation,
both in the Netherlands and in Indonesia, of the South Moluccans in relation to self-determination and
restorative justice. Attorney Musa Dan-Fodio noted that the African American struggle has gone through
successive stages related to their institutionalized relations in America, from enslavement to segregation
to the civil rights period, that this struggle was continuous, and is now at the stage of searching for justice
through self-determination. He introduced a video presentation to the Conference by Marquetta L.
Goodwine, recently enstooled as Chief of the Gullah-Geechee Nation. Ms. Goodwine outlined the long
resistance of the Gullah-Geechee people to assimilation, their efforts to restore and maintain their culture,
including the Gullah language, in full respect of the ways of their ancestors.
The Right Honourable Gerald Kaufman, a member of the British Parliament, presented an analysis of
Theme II (The relationship between policies of forced assimilation and racism, ethnocide and armed
conflict in the context of denial of just demands for self-determination) by providing a wide-ranging analysis
of how the self-determination efforts of internal peoples are resisted and defeated by states, balanced on
the other hand, by remarks on the extent to which resorting to violence has subsequently furthered
demands for self-determination where other measures were not yet in place or had proved unsuccessful.
Mr. Kenneth Deer, editor of The Eastern Door, addressed the situation of the Mohawks in Canada,
reflecting his long involvement in indigenous issues over the past 14 years, including discussions related
to the ILO Convention 169 and the draft Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.
Due to the extensive number of interventions from the floor concerning a wide range of local situations, and
the fact that two speakers on Theme V would not be available if it were to be presented on the following
day, Theme V was addressed before Theme III. UN Sub-Commission Expert Françoise Jane Hampson
opened Theme V (Self-determination as a means of further democratisation of the UN and the
international system). She introduced the notion of minority rights as self-determination through structures
of governance rights, and outlined the possibilities attendant on a future creation of an Assembly of
Nations, to take its place in interaction with other formal UN bodies such as the General Assembly and
Security Council. Prof. Mehdi Imberesh of Al Fateh University and former Libyan Ambassador to Germany,
Iran, and at present to Turkmenistan, spoke passionately on how the world should examine the fact that it
is elites, who are themselves minorities, who are running its affairs, since the peoples abrogate their
democratic powers by surrendering them to representatives who by that very fact fail to adequately address
their interests and needs. Theme V was moderated by Dr. Joseph Wronka, author of Human Rights and
Social Policy in the 21st Century.
The last speaker on Theme V, Dr. Hans Koechler, Head of the Philosophy Department at the University of
Innsbruck, Austria and Director of the International Progress Organization, addressed the Conference the
next morning. His scholarly analysis of the UNs conception and early development, rooted in the policy
aims of Allied Powers, was greeted with great interest, as was his outline of means of potential UN reform
with a view to its further democratization.
The Conference then returned to Theme III (Self-Determination through Minority Rights, Internal Autonomy
or Secession). It was opened by Mme. Ragnhild Nystad, Vice-President of the Saami Parliament, with the
Saami flag emblazoned on the Conference screen beside her. Ms. Nystad discussed the relation of
governmental structures to the Saami people, who are dispersed throughout Norway, Denmark and
Sweden. Dr. Robert Brock of the African American Self-Determination Committee, made an impassioned
plea for reparations for the African American national minority, as did his wife, Mickey. Mr. Joseph v.
Komlossy, Vice President of the Federal Union of European Nationalities, discussed how effectively
minority rights had been instituted in Hungary where 13 cultural minorities enjoy autonomy, a system which
has proved very successful towards the development of all groups.
Conference attendees then adjourned to their choice of one of the four prototype workshops, based on the
situation of the Kashmiris, Native Americans, African Americans and the Dalits of India. Workshop
moderators (S.N. Gilani, Rudy James, Dr. Farid I. Muhammad and Dr. Laxmi Berwa, respectively) then
presented their reports in the closing plenary, which was chaired by Dr. Y. N. Kly.
Numerous unscheduled interventions from the floor were made throughout the Conference, adding to its
interest, depth and breadth, such as those provided by the Kashmiris, Tamils, Irish, Dalits, and indigenous
peoples. For example, the Conference received a Petition and Diplomatic Protest from the Kuiu Thlingit
Nation and the United Native Nations protesting the current attempt of the state of Alaska to permanent
Quiet Title to submerged lands in the Alexander Archipelago. Dr. Laxmi Berwa advised the Conference
of the need to institute a UNDP Human Rights Development mechanism to prevent all kinds of oppression
against Dalits in India. The Irish 32 County Sovereignty Movement called for the Secretary-General and the
UN Human Rights High Commissioner, to intervene in the visa denial of its members by the USA and
allow it to pursue its peaceful challenge at the UN.
Mr. George Reid, who gave the opening address, delivered an eloquent closing summation as well,
reviewing the outcome of the Conference and suggesting future courses of action. Mr. Reid reiterated that
self-determination is an ongoing process, and the effort to achieve it will not stop until true freedom is
Introducing the resolutions to the Conference, Barrister Majid Tramboo, Executive Director, ICHR, stated
that there has been an international expansion in the desire for democracy, and that the concepts of
democracy and the right to self-determination are interlinked. He believed that the popular political concept
of self-determination used by states has developed a division into two limbs, i.e. the first limb entailing the
right to external self-determination, confined to populations of fixed territorial entities, such as overseas
colonies, forced occupations, unrepresented peoples and nations, and the second limb relating to the
right to internal self-determination evolving into what seems to be an articulation of the type of rights most
often demanded by national minorities. He stressed the need to have a mechanism in place to address
this vital human right.
The following resolutions were debated and unanimously passed by the Conference:
1. In the ongoing efforts of reconstruction of the United Nations in line with the requirements for the
success of its mission, this Conference recommends the following:
(a) The establishment of an Office of the High Commissioner for Self-Determination; and
(b) the establishment of a Self-Determination Commission comprised of representatives of United
Nations member states.
2. This Conference reaffirms the importance of the right to Self-Determination as enshrined in the
Charter of the United Nations and other international documents. The Conference further condemns all
violations of this right.
3. This Conference invites the organisers of the Second International Conference on the Right to
Self-Determination and the United Nations to initiate a process by which individual cases may be
comprehensively discussed and specific resolutions adopted accordingly.
The above resolutions were agreed to on the basis of the discussions, lectures and interventions
presented under the Conference themes, as well as the reports received from the Conference workshops.
The Conferences Collected Papers and Proceedings will be published by Clarity Press, Inc., of Atlanta, in
a volume to be titled In Pursuit of the Right to Self-Determination: Collected Papers and Proceedings of the
First International Conference on the Right to Self-Determination & the United Nations.
In closing the Conference, IHRAAM Chair, Dr. Y. N. Kly stressed the significance of mutual respect and the
need for willingness to continually renegotiate the relations of groups living together in multinational states
as key themes that emerged from the Conference. He announced the holding of a First Regional
Conference on the Right to Self-Determination and an expanded Second International Conference on the
Right to Self-Determination. The dates and venues of both conferences are to be announced.
The Conference resolutions have been formally submitted to the UN Secretary-General, to the UN High
Commissioner for Human Rights, and to the Chair of the UN Working Group on Minorities by IHRAAM
Chair, Dr. Y. N. Kly.
This press release is issued by Mrs. Diana Kly, Program Director, and Mr. Colin McNaughton, Operations
Director, of the First International Conference on the Right to Self-Determination and the United Nations.